Skip to content

Home Arena Leaderboard Token sale

Loading…

Public calls. Verifiable outcomes.

Methodology Docs Privacy Terms & risk X ↗

Leaderboard This week Head to head Get ranked Methodology Claim profile

Published scoresSign in with X

Leaderboard / @AltcoinSherpa / 2082813696225562854:memecoin:$LIT

Prediction evidence

incorrectPolicy v1.0

Source post

Published 30 Jul 2026, 13:00 UTC · fetched 19 Oct 2026, 13:39 UTC

Al

Altcoin Sherpa

@AltcoinSherpa

$LIT still 1 of the better coins you can buy from a fundamental level, I think this current consolidation is good and healthy. Would love to see it spend more time around this $2-$2.20 area and then form a base to move higher. https://t.co/MHeUDnJMZC

View original on X ↗

How this was scored

Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result

Baseline: first $LIT price at or after publication, $2.28 at 30 Jul 2026, 14:00 UTC.
Evaluation: price at the end of the 24 hours horizon, $2.16 at 31 Jul 2026, 14:00 UTC.
r = 2.15651575735621 / 2.28470637275749 − 1 = -5.61%
Direction d = +1 (bullish), so d × r = -5.61% (neutral only if the price is unchanged) → incorrect

Only the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology

AI interpretation

Uses only text available at publication time

Asset: Memecoins: $LIT ($LIT)
Direction: ▲ Bullish
Intent: inferred
Horizon: 24 hours (default, none stated)
Evidence span: “$LIT still 1 of the better coins you can buy from a fundamental level, I think this current consolidation is good and healthy.”
Confidence: 94%
Review state: auto accepted
Model / prompt: gpt-6-luna+decisions · decisions-v3

Outcome record

Status

incorrect

Baseline price

$2.28

Evaluation price

$2.16

Move

-5.61%

Neutral threshold

Unchanged price only

Price provider

geckoterminal

Evaluated at

21 Oct 2026, 17:12 UTC

Policy version

v1.0

Request a correction

Think the interpretation or outcome is wrong? Sign in with X to request a correction, so reviewers know who is asking.

Sign in to request a correction