Loading…

Prediction evidence

incorrectPolicy v1.0

Source post

Published 24 Jul 2026, 14:50 UTC · fetched 3 Nov 2026, 11:00 UTC

Ryan Rossi | Horse

@TheFlowHorse

Quoting · 21 Jul 2026, 14:23 UTC · context given to the AI

All the worst traders I know are just starting to get very bullish BTC right here. Probably trap some longs into or around that 67.3 high and turn on the washing machine again. https://t.co/bwUKTCqDio

Literal pico top. 🎯 I would also warn that the same people have been creating a false sense of urgency the last week, telling their followers they should basically be dollar cost averaging into altcoins again. https://t.co/m5AAZdZM4N

View original on X ↗

How this was scored

Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result

Baseline: first BTC price at or after publication, $63,994 at 24 Jul 2026, 15:00 UTC.
Evaluation: price at the end of the 24 hours horizon, $64,145 at 25 Jul 2026, 15:00 UTC.
r = 64145.25 / 63993.52 − 1 = +0.2%
Direction d = −1 (bearish), so d × r = -0.2% (neutral only if the price is unchanged) → incorrect

Only the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology

AI interpretation

Uses only text available at publication time

Asset: Bitcoin (BTC)
Direction: ▼ Bearish
Intent: explicit
Horizon: 24 hours (default, none stated)
Evidence span: “Literal pico top. 🎯 I would also warn that the same people have been creating a false sense of urgency the last week, telling their followers they should basically be dollar cost averaging into altcoins again. https://t.co/m5AAZdZM4N”
Confidence: 95%
Review state: auto accepted
Model / prompt: gpt-6-luna+decisions · decisions-v3

Prediction evidence

Source post

How this was scored

AI interpretation

Outcome record

Request a correction