Published 24 Jul 2026, 14:26 UTC · fetched 3 Nov 2026, 13:36 UTC
Luke Gromen
@LukeGromen
In reply to · 23 Jul 2026, 23:20 UTC · context given to the AI
Interesting. If we run with the China-crisis scenario and it really does take everything down with it, the point you made on gold is valid. But I’m also wondering, in the reordering that would follow, is it possible Bitcoin ends up becoming the stronger neutral reserve asset than gold over time? It’s clearly more volatile right now, but that gap feels like something that could compress as liquidity deepens and more balance sheets start treating it as actual money rather than a risk asset. Of course these situations are more hypothetical than anything, but I do have genuine conviction in Bitcoin over gold at some point. And historically, crashes of that scale have acted like highways that force these transitions in world systems.@i_am_liam Possibly, but tough to say.View original on X ↗
Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result
unscored Awaiting manual review
Only the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology
Uses only text available at publication time
Think the interpretation or outcome is wrong? Sign in with X to request a correction, so reviewers know who is asking.
Sign in to request a correction