Published 19 Jul 2026, 21:30 UTC · fetched 3 Nov 2026, 10:55 UTC
Bluntz
@Bluntz_Capital
Quoting · 19 Jul 2026, 20:36 UTC · context given to the AI
bought $PUMP here on the reclaim of old support @ .001675 thesis: making 30-40M a month during bear market for onchain, believe that $SOL will dominate retail activity again this cycle and https://t.co/1Sc1wp6gLc will be most likely beneficiary of this activity if that happens hard for me to believe that they don't see the opportunity in front of them by providing a stimulus package to the trenches w/ the airdrop, especially given historical precedent of how Jito & Jupiter jumpstarted onchain activity in late 2023, if they do airdrop 300M+ then volumes/attention/activity should improve meaningfully regularly competing w/ hyperliquid & polymarket for most profitable crypto protocol also just hard for me to believe that they don't want the token to do well as they own a meaningful amount of it which just started unlocking & their entire business is centered around allowing retail to speculate on tokenization invalidation at lows during unlock selloff around .0014ansem makes a good point here tbh, with these numbers owning the casino itself feels like a good shout considering these numbers. plus theres a clear $pump downtrend break off the back of an 83% decline https://t.co/u1YQFsI9l5 https://t.co/vEj8qo8VLSView original on X ↗
Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result
r = 0.002002526090602848 / 0.0019313375436034081 − 1 = +3.7%d × r = +3.7% (neutral only if the price is unchanged) → correctOnly the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology
Uses only text available at publication time
Think the interpretation or outcome is wrong? Sign in with X to request a correction, so reviewers know who is asking.
Sign in to request a correction