Loading…
Published 15 Jul 2026, 11:39 UTC · fetched 3 Nov 2026, 13:49 UTC
Tone Vays
@ToneVays
Quoting · 2 Jul 2026, 20:41 UTC · context given to the AI
Bitcoin OG @ToneVays gives his full unfiltered take on the BIP-110 controversy: "People have been convinced that just because you're able to spin up a node, that somehow you should be in control of the Bitcoin network, and that's a very dangerous precedent." https://t.co/XD0PrAz8lhI will never talk about Bitcoin again, it will become no different than Litecoin, Ethereum or Hex, a centralized database with 1 developer deciding on code changes ... I already hold 0 Bitcoin because of Bip110 attack Risk (& bear market) so I basically won't be buying any back for store of value purposes. - If next month it appears that Bip110 is going to succeed or create a dangerous chain split, I expect the price to crash to under $10k in 1 week hence I have 0 reason to have Bitcoin exposure and risk my life savings.... The only people pushing for Bip110 are those with almost NO Wealth in Bitcoin.... * I explained it on @SimplyBitcoin here: https://t.co/z4phbk1G4rView original on X ↗
Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result
r = 62800.59 / 64679.33 − 1 = -2.9%d × r = +2.9% (neutral only if the price is unchanged) → correctOnly the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology
Uses only text available at publication time
Think the interpretation or outcome is wrong? Sign in with X to request a correction, so reviewers know who is asking.
Sign in to request a correction