Published 12 Jul 2026, 08:12 UTC · fetched 3 Nov 2026, 10:58 UTC
₿IRB
@crypto_birb
Quoting · 11 Jul 2026, 15:00 UTC · context given to the AI
Stop treating the 200-day MA like a support level. It's a trend map. A summary of where price has been over 200 days. Most traders wait for it to hold. Sometimes it does. Sometimes price slices straight through. The mistake is asking the wrong question. Don't ask if the 200 MA will hold. Ask if it's rising or falling. Rising 200 MA + price above = bull market environment. Falling 200 MA + price below = bear market environment. That's the environment. Everything else is short-term fluctuation. Moving averages are trend-following tools. Direction is the signal. Level is the noise. Bookmark so you can come back to this anytime.In reply to · 11 Jul 2026, 19:00 UTC · context given to the AI
We're at 64k. Statistically, not much upside left. Let me explain. We're now where bitcoin was at 46k in 2022 before falling to 15.5k or at 13.9k in 2018 before dropping 3.2k. Both times, the bear wasn't done. July is positive. In midterm years average +10.52%. We opened at 58.5k so math lands us at 63.4-64.6k. But Q3 is set to destroy the bulls. Midterm Aug-Sept is -16.68% avg. Verdict is small bump then down. The cycle isn't done reminding you what it is. Thoughts?How do I know bear market’s not finished? It's simple. Just look at the 200-day SMA line. It says everything about the overall direction and dominant trend of the market. In post below I explain how that works. Steep down = bear market at full speed. Statistically, $30k low makes most sense. That's my thesis until proven wrong. Until then, I'm day trading BTC and alts with no KYC on bitbase. You can join my team if you want (takes 1 min): https://t.co/4Kg0qHEoyaView original on X ↗
Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result
r = 63142.5 / 63940.08 − 1 = -1.2%d × r = +1.2% (neutral only if the price is unchanged) → correctOnly the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology
Uses only text available at publication time
Think the interpretation or outcome is wrong? Sign in with X to request a correction, so reviewers know who is asking.
Sign in to request a correction