Loading…
Published 29 Jun 2026, 03:05 UTC · fetched 3 Nov 2026, 10:55 UTC
Bluntz
@Bluntz_Capital
Quoting · 1 Feb 2025, 19:32 UTC · context given to the AI
$sol losing 220 is really bad imo. invalidates the abc from the highs and makes it look more impulsive and looks like theres a 2 week bear div printing in 24hrs and it will need an absolute miracle to save that. its over imo. https://t.co/VppIrIX2MZjust like weekly bear divs were an amazing predictor of the bull market top on $SOL, it also cuts both ways. if you're bearish down here im sorry but you are clinically retarded. https://t.co/ovFwOhCiv4 https://t.co/zvUffUrwesView original on X ↗
Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result
r = 74.07 / 72.56 − 1 = +2.1%d × r = +2.1% (neutral only if the price is unchanged) → correctOnly the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology
Uses only text available at publication time
Think the interpretation or outcome is wrong? Sign in with X to request a correction, so reviewers know who is asking.
Sign in to request a correction