Published 27 Jun 2026, 22:42 UTC · fetched 3 Nov 2026, 10:59 UTC
IncomeSharks
@IncomeSharks
In reply to · 27 Jun 2026, 03:43 UTC · context given to the AI
Health Care has a 100% win rate in the back half of midterm election years. Not 80%. Not 90%. ONE HUNDRED PERCENT. I looked at every midterm year since 2006. Here's how each sector performed from July to December: 1. Health Care $XLV: +8.46% avg, 100% win rate 2. Industrials $XLI: +7.18%, 80% 3. Materials $XLB: +6.71%, 60% 4. Financials $XLF: +6.68%, 80% 5. Cons. Discretionary $XLY: +6.35%, 60% 6. Cons. Staples $XLP: +6.29%, 80% 7. Utilities $XLU: +6.18%, 80% 8. Technology $XLK: +6.08%, 60% 9. Energy $XLE: +3.26%, 60% 10. Real Estate $XLRE: -7.94%, 0% The S&P 500 $SPY averaged: +5.95%. Three things nobody is talking about: 1. Health Care outperforms EVERY sector in midterm H2. Not tech. Not discretionary. Health Care. Five for five. 2. Tech drops to #8. The darling of every other year becomes middle of the pack when midterm volatility kicks in (60% win rate). 3. Real Estate has NEVER been positive Jul-Dec in a midterm year. 0 for 2. Negative every single time. 2026 is a midterm year. The rotation is underway. It always does.@asklivermore Healthcare, biotech, genomes. Easy play. $XBI $ARKG $GNOMView original on X ↗
Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result
unscored Awaiting manual review
Only the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology
Uses only text available at publication time
Think the interpretation or outcome is wrong? Sign in with X to request a correction, so reviewers know who is asking.
Sign in to request a correction