Loading…
Published 27 Jun 2026, 14:05 UTC · fetched 3 Nov 2026, 13:49 UTC
Tone Vays
@ToneVays
In reply to · 27 Jun 2026, 13:58 UTC · context given to the AI
@ToneVays @asanoha_gold I won't do that. That's suicide. If it fails, it fails. I just don't think that outcome is as likely as you do.BIP110 has to fail, because if it succeeds then #Bitcion has failed: - It will prove a tiny loud voice can change bitcoin direction out of consensus - It will hand over development to one guy - It will set a new precedent for temporary changes and debates over the same issue a year from now This is NOT the bitcoin that interests me, all my wealth will be in the SPX, Bitcoin won't be worth holding as it will be a centralized network like Ethereum.... guess that's what you prefer, enjoy!!!View original on X ↗
Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result
r = 59939.28 / 60510.22 − 1 = -0.9%d × r = +0.9% (neutral only if the price is unchanged) → correctOnly the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology
Uses only text available at publication time
Think the interpretation or outcome is wrong? Sign in with X to request a correction, so reviewers know who is asking.
Sign in to request a correction