Loading…
Published 25 Jun 2026, 14:32 UTC · fetched 3 Nov 2026, 10:57 UTC
Chase
@Crypto_Chase
In reply to · 25 Jun 2026, 14:25 UTC · context given to the AI
true, you have, well done but....when you posted this....everyone got angry at you, made fun of it, etc. However now that this thought is no longer ¨contrary¨ and the whole of crypto-x is sh*tting on Saylor, i actually wonder, what if the crypto-x herd is wrong again and his whole ponzi does not collapse? I hope it does collapse to be honest to cleanse the space of this nuclear bomb, but i also challenge myself to think what if it does not? I think he would make it even bigger the next cycle until it does finally collapse, so better get it over with asap i guess before this man goes even further out of controlthanks man. the truth is we don't need it to collapse. All I want to see is him be forced to sell like 3 billion worth of Bitcoin and that will send price down to low 50ks at the minimum. panic will ensue but he will have a ton of runway and then he will be liquidated in later years rather than this yearView original on X ↗
Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result
r = 59500.3 / 59374.19 − 1 = +0.2%d × r = -0.2% (neutral only if the price is unchanged) → incorrectOnly the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology
Uses only text available at publication time
Think the interpretation or outcome is wrong? Sign in with X to request a correction, so reviewers know who is asking.
Sign in to request a correction