Prediction evidence

To

Tone Vays

@ToneVays

I don't have one, I don't plan to support a URSF, if the miners do not plan on defending the decentralized Bitcoin network then I'd rather see bitcoin die and go to 0 sooner than later. If the URSF wins it will also set a terrible long term president going forward where next time bitcoin will likely split into multiple viable forks. In 2017, I was wiling to be the ONLY miner mining UASF bip148 (see old videos of me talking about this). I knew I wasn't going to be the only one but I was willing to let 'my' bitcoin go to 0 vs watch it die in a hard fork to 2mb under SegWit2x. This time it's the opposite, i'm perfectly at piece with bitcoin dyeing & going to 0 if Bip110 wins handing over development to 1 guy who loves running to FBI to solve his bitcion issues. * The big difference this time is that I won't hold any bitcoin to watching them go to 0, I'm putting my money where my mouth is and will be at 0 bitcoin exposure watching it go sub $10k from the side lines. If the miners are not willing to defend bitcoin's decentralized system by ignoring Bip110 attack then I don't see how supporting a URSF makes the bitcoin network more resilient to future attack. In addition, I have not seen ANY competent devs who's coding skills I respect/trust working on a URSF (but i'm also not looking very closely yet).... if Bip110 gets 5% signaling during a difficulty period, I might start paying attention. Bip110 has NO consensus, it's a massive civil attack with 80+% fake nodes & 90+% AI Anonymous X accounts created in 202x. And the nodes that are real have minimal Economic Value. Basically if Bip110 wins bitcoin as a decentralized network dies. I will have 0 interest in the network, it will be no different than HEX, ETH or ADA!