Loading…

Prediction evidence

incorrectPolicy v1.0

Source post

Published 20 Jun 2026, 22:14 UTC · fetched 3 Nov 2026, 10:55 UTC

Bluntz

@Bluntz_Capital

whether or not the solana:So11111111111111111111111111111111111111112 bottom is in or not is yet to be seen but imo its VERY close if not in already. you dont fade weekly bull divs after 80% drawdowns from peak to trough on majors. its like a cardinal sin https://t.co/dutMXEQ0So

View original on X ↗

How this was scored

Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result

Baseline: first SOL price at or after publication, $73.48 at 20 Jun 2026, 23:00 UTC.
Evaluation: price at the end of the 24 hours horizon, $72.96 at 21 Jun 2026, 23:00 UTC.
r = 72.96 / 73.48 − 1 = -0.7%
Direction d = +1 (bullish), so d × r = -0.7% (neutral only if the price is unchanged) → incorrect

Only the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology

AI interpretation

Uses only text available at publication time

Asset: Solana (SOL)
Direction: ▲ Bullish
Intent: explicit
Horizon: 24 hours (default, none stated)
Evidence span: “whether or not the solana:So11111111111111111111111111111111111111112 bottom is in or not is yet to be seen but imo its VERY close if not in already.”
Confidence: 99%
Review state: auto accepted
Model / prompt: gpt-6-luna+decisions · decisions-v3

Prediction evidence

Source post

How this was scored

AI interpretation

Outcome record

Request a correction