Loading…
Published 18 Jun 2026, 12:56 UTC · fetched 14 Oct 2026, 10:57 UTC
K A L E O
@CryptoKaleo
In reply to · 18 Jun 2026, 12:46 UTC · context given to the AI
I agree with your thesis, but I think you're missing an important part of the ponzi that MSTR was always designed to be diluted and sent to zero for a Saylor exit. 100% in agreement he should have sold BTC already and he will sell at a terrible price (just like he can't buy at a reasonable price he is the king of poor execution). So yeah we're in agreement I was just being a dickhead.haha all good I laughed and honestly the sad thing is it took me much longer than it should have to wake up to the ponzi I was blinded for a long time by "Saylor is pressing the buy button on an asset I like so I like him and what they're doing" took seeing him break several lies to actually do a deep dive and realize how messed up the current structure is so as annoying as I might be on the timeline right now I'd rather hopefully wake a few more people up to the ponzi before it takes the next major leg down rather than sitting from the sidelines in silence and the dumbest argument is I've seen people try and say I'm doing this for engagement - I'd get a ton more engagement just riding Saylor's dick to zero like the rest of his cult is apparently willing to doView original on X ↗
Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result
unscored Repeat call within an existing 24h episode
Only the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology
Repeated same-asset, same-direction calls count once, anchored to the first eligible post
Uses only text available at publication time
Think the interpretation or outcome is wrong? Sign in with X to request a correction, so reviewers know who is asking.
Sign in to request a correction