Published 13 Jun 2026, 13:41 UTC · fetched 3 Nov 2026, 13:33 UTC
Cheds Trading
@BigCheds
In reply to · 13 Jun 2026, 12:07 UTC · context given to the AI
$BTC Based on every previous cycle, once the capitulation candle forms (the major cycle low), the sweep of that low has historically marked the bottom. We've already seen that sweep. The capitulation low has been taken. The only thing that doesn't quite fit is the timing. Historically, bear market bottoms have formed around Q4, not Q2. So the question becomes, do you trust the price action more, or the timing more? At some point, one will break. We're only a few months away from the traditional timing window anyway, so it would be somewhat ironic if the market bottomed earlier than expected, just as it topped earlier than many anticipated. The price action is already showing characteristics we've seen at previous cycle lows. The debate now is whether timing matters more than what the market is actually doing.@KillaXBT I think what’s missing is a strong response from this recent 60 K Test. The response has been very weak.View original on X ↗
Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result
unscored Awaiting manual review
Only the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology
Uses only text available at publication time
Think the interpretation or outcome is wrong? Sign in with X to request a correction, so reviewers know who is asking.
Sign in to request a correction