Published 5 Jun 2026, 07:53 UTC · fetched 6 Nov 2026, 14:17 UTC
swarmik
@swarmister
Quoting · 4 Jun 2026, 17:03 UTC · context given to the AI
I’ll throw out some market takes based on what I’m seeing. Honestly, I still think the market goes lower. Even $30k BTC doesn’t sound crazy to me anymore. Why not? Right now almost all liquidity from every corner of the market is flowing straight into the U.S. stock market pump. It’s hard to imagine there’s enough liquidity left for crypto when the main objective seems to be keeping the AI bubble alive and pushing equities even higher. The real collapse probably comes only after the major players get their IPO exits. Until then, all we’ll keep seeing is CZ, BaSe, and every other player at that level launching or pumping their own garbage, finding fresh idiots to dump on, and unloading bags into them. That’s not a healthy market. When you’re not getting beaten by other players, but by the casino itself, something is fundamentally wrong. Now add the fact that there’s still no shortage of people waiting for alt season. They’re sitting there, hoping. Here’s a question for all the altcoin believers: if someone gave you the ability to rewind time, and you kept rewinding it over and over, growing old while absolutely nothing changed, what would you do? That said, crypto is still the most insane opportunity market on Earth. You’ll probably say, “Swarmik, you’re an idiot.” But here’s the thing: because of all the AI-generated garbage, project quality has become even worse. Teams leave behind absolutely ridiculous exploits without even realizing it. It’s basically “walk in, steal liquidity, walk out.” Just look at how many projects have been “hacked.” You’d spend all day listing them. The scammer’s job is simple: find where some outsourced developer screwed up and extract liquidity. Although, personally, I think a lot of the time it’s the project teams themselves doing it. Markets wash out the weak and the stupid. We’re simply in an evolutionary phase where weak genes die and strong ones move forward.This is exactly what I was talking about. The developers are lazy retards, and yet some indian managed to pull this off with just a $20 subscription to Claude. Just imagine how much money he could have made. And the main question for me is: what’s the next project? https://t.co/LUtfq7c8UO https://t.co/RGMhqpzENAView original on X ↗
Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result
unscored Awaiting manual review
Only the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology
Uses only text available at publication time
Think the interpretation or outcome is wrong? Sign in with X to request a correction, so reviewers know who is asking.
Sign in to request a correction