Published 4 Jun 2026, 18:20 UTC · fetched 3 Nov 2026, 10:57 UTC
Killa
@KillaXBT
In reply to · 4 Jun 2026, 17:48 UTC · context given to the AI
I am officially swing long on $BTC Invalidation 31950. Target 160,000. I will see you in 1-2 years from now. Let the games begin. 🎲 https://t.co/JOuDq69gOk https://t.co/5zwRVTAFnC"OMG Killa, that's a 50% drop as invalidation!" Yes. It is. But what people keep ignoring is the other side of the equation. My target is an extremely modest $160K BTC. From my entry, that's roughly a 150% move higher. So the risk/reward is approximately 3:1. If you're trading on high leverage, then obviously this setup is terrible for you. A 50% invalidation and high leverage do not mix. That's not how I'm approaching this trade. You have two ways to deal with that: Use low leverage. Or Continuously add margin to defend the position. I have zero interest in option #2. That's never been my style. Instead, I'll be using extremely low leverage, which allows me to give the position room to breathe without constantly managing margin requirements. I already hold enough spot BTC. The reason I want a long position is because it gives me the ability to delta-neutral hedge when BTC starts trending higher again. Let's say we get rejected at $84K on the first attempt. Or maybe $100K. Maybe $120K. With a leveraged position already open, I can hedge it, go delta neutral, preserve profits, eliminate directional risk on the position, and continue holding without stress. Funding fees were also part of my calculations. Looking at the 1Y average, funding costs are roughly 7-8% annually. During most of the bull market, funding has actually been more negative than positive. We only saw notable positive flips around $74K, $108K, and $124K a handful of times. The majority of the rally wasn't dominated by positive funding at all. So I'm not telling anyone to follow me. I'm not telling anyone to copy my trades. I'm simply explaining what I'm doing, why I'm doing it, and how I'm approaching this market. You're free to analyze the market your own way and come to your own conclusions.View original on X ↗
Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result
unscored Awaiting manual review
Only the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology
Uses only text available at publication time
Think the interpretation or outcome is wrong? Sign in with X to request a correction, so reviewers know who is asking.
Sign in to request a correction