Loading…

Prediction evidence

incorrectPolicy v1.0

Source post

Published 4 Jun 2026, 09:08 UTC · fetched 6 Nov 2026, 14:19 UTC

Rand Group

@randgroup

In reply to · 4 Jun 2026, 08:43 UTC · context given to the AI

@randgroup $SOL will come back, no way this stays on Actually , seeing CT talking BS about $SOL is funny because when it starts pumping hard in the next 12 months they will flip flop 🤣

@Mrbullemmy I do agree that $SOL will bounce back, far too much happening, ETFs, Public companies hodling in the reserves, RWA growth etc.

View original on X ↗

How this was scored

Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result

Baseline: first SOL price at or after publication, $68.78 at 4 Jun 2026, 10:00 UTC.
Evaluation: price at the end of the 24 hours horizon, $66.50 at 5 Jun 2026, 10:00 UTC.
r = 66.5 / 68.78 − 1 = -3.3%
Direction d = +1 (bullish), so d × r = -3.3% (neutral only if the price is unchanged) → incorrect

Only the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology

AI interpretation

Uses only text available at publication time

Asset: Solana (SOL)
Direction: ▲ Bullish
Intent: explicit
Horizon: 24 hours (default, none stated)
Evidence span: “@Mrbullemmy I do agree that $SOL will bounce back, far too much happening, ETFs, Public companies hodling in the reserves, RWA growth etc.”
Confidence: 95%
Review state: auto accepted
Model / prompt: gpt-6-luna+decisions · decisions-v3

Prediction evidence

Source post

How this was scored

AI interpretation

Outcome record

Request a correction