Published 4 Jun 2026, 07:32 UTC · fetched 20 Oct 2026, 05:26 UTC
CrediBULL Crypto
@CredibleCrypto
So two things you need to consider. First, the length of time of the 1st subwave, which would be our move from 15k to about 110k- which took two years to play out. The 3rd and 5th should be "relative" to that wave in terms of time- meaning not necessarily the same, but "proportional". The second thing you need to consider is that if this is an extended move, then it should get MORE aggressive through the 3rd and 5th, which generally means those moves should happen faster than the 1st once they begin. This also supports the blow off top idea- a faster more aggressive expansion than the 15k-100k rally. So when you combine these two factors you can say the 3rd and 5th should each take less than 2 years, but how much less is hard to say, and we have to keep in mind a 4th wave correction happens somewhere between the two which will take time of it's own. Finally, if all this is going to happen it just means the blow off top for alts gets pushed further back as well- but considering where alts are now they probs start running somewhere during this Wave 2 correction of BTC, so you're not going to have to wait that long for say $1 CRV even if BTC has a couple more years to run. You may have to wait longer for those "cycle end" targets though if BTC isn't done here either.View original on X ↗
Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result
unscored Awaiting manual review
Only the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology
Uses only text available at publication time
Think the interpretation or outcome is wrong? Sign in with X to request a correction, so reviewers know who is asking.
Sign in to request a correction