Published 4 Jun 2026, 04:10 UTC · fetched 3 Nov 2026, 10:55 UTC
Bluntz
@Bluntz_Capital
Quoting · 30 May 2026, 21:55 UTC · context given to the AI
this $cards uptrend is solid and text book, keeps breaking out and consolidating above highs. ppl keep pointing out the revenue numbers that collectr crypt are doing shouldn't be used because revenue isnt profit, which is absurd, but lets agree for the sake of their own argument and use profit numbers instead. collectr crypt did 4.6m profit last month and this month all signs are pointing towards that being even higher, annualized thats 55m profit. if we were valuing this like a stock we'd be talking 700m-1b mcap and thats conservative. team has already said they intend to do buybacks in the future but will do so months after the fact so people cant frontrun them, telegraphing it to the world is -EV for them duh. also FWIW many people obivously want buybacks but as a holder i personally want the team to keep reinvesting profits into inventory, team also knows this is how they win. not only are they making insane money on the gacha itself but long term, the real growth imo will come from the marketplace itself which takes a 2% fee for any slabs sold (ebay charges 10%) this relies on people keeping cards they pull on collectr crypt and trading on the marketplace, and the only way the marketplace gets the liquidity it needs to succeed is by constantly procuring more inventory and people keeping cards they pull on the gacha, they incentivize people keeping the cards by having the spins be +EV over the long term which they are already doing and around 35% of people are already keeping cards pulled buybacks are great for the short term non believers but they come at the expense of growth, and i believe the team knows this, @TuomHolmberg seems like a very smart guy.yet another textbook cards consolidation above prior breakout. such an orderly textbook uptrend, theres no doubt in my mind that $cards sees an all time high this year https://t.co/gMv9CSywii https://t.co/IzhWFuU16cView original on X ↗
Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result
unscored Awaiting manual review
Only the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology
Uses only text available at publication time
Think the interpretation or outcome is wrong? Sign in with X to request a correction, so reviewers know who is asking.
Sign in to request a correction