Published 2 Jun 2026, 18:53 UTC · fetched 3 Nov 2026, 10:56 UTC
Alex Krüger
@krugermacro
In reply to · 2 Jun 2026, 18:02 UTC · context given to the AI
@krugermacro How do you see the next few months to years playing out for BTC alex?I think Strategy will first lower the 1.22 threshold (self imposed) and issue MSTR common. BTC goes up on that, as it relieves the need to sell BTC to cover the STRC dividend (now down to ~5 months coverage). The magnitude of the relief depends on how much they can raise that way, given mNAV. If the numbers fall short Strategy may still be forced to sell BTC, in size this time. They basically need to choose if to sacrifice MSTR, STRC or BTC (or all). That would solve the pressing STRC issue, at least temporarily. All assuming Strategy did not already raise cash by selling BTC this week (doubtful). Then Strategy still has significant debt to roll-over in 2028 ... which is very doable. But the market may decide to chase Saylor and force a credit event. Everybody is willing to lend you money, when you don't need it. The downside if things go wrong is large. BTC is now fully linked to Strategy's creditworthiness. The path ahead for BTC is uncertain, but there's a very fat left tail. Many crypto natives on the sidelines have been expressing interest to buy only at 50K. I have no position and for the first time in a while I'm not even considering buying the dip. There are better assets to allocate capital to.View original on X ↗
Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result
r = 65939.52 / 67215.76 − 1 = -1.9%d × r = +1.9% (neutral only if the price is unchanged) → correctOnly the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology
Uses only text available at publication time
Think the interpretation or outcome is wrong? Sign in with X to request a correction, so reviewers know who is asking.
Sign in to request a correction