Published 30 May 2026, 02:32 UTC · fetched 3 Nov 2026, 11:01 UTC
Don’t Follow Shardi B If You Hate Money
@ShardiB2
Quoting · 29 May 2026, 23:55 UTC · context given to the AI
lot of implications to Dell’s upstream suppliers that markets might not have priced in yet. Dell didn’t just beat, they’re now physically capped by components while demand keeps exploding. Exec quotes are blunt: H2 is supply constrained, not demand. The hierarchy they laid out is the map: Memory (DRAM/NAND/HBM) is #1 and tightening daily. AI servers eat multiples more per box, prices are moving fast, 2026-27 capacity is already locked. Straight lift for $MU and the big memory names. Microprocessors next – $AMD is the clear winner here; Dell is pushing their latest EPYC hard in the new liquid-cooled racks. Then hard drives: lead times hitting a full year, nearline storage basically allocated through 2027. $STX and $WDC are in allocation mode with fat incremental margins. That’s why the spillovers hit peers ($SMCI, HPE get the overflow orders), cooling/power ($VRT because air cooling is dead at these densities), and the whole chain stays tight. Not a one-quarter story. Multi-year locked deals + real physics bottlenecks.Memory Memory Memory #1 on the list It’s obvious why the analysts are rushing to up their targets by 100% $MU $SNDK https://t.co/oPXfi0d8D0View original on X ↗
Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result
unscored Awaiting manual review
Only the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology
Uses only text available at publication time
Think the interpretation or outcome is wrong? Sign in with X to request a correction, so reviewers know who is asking.
Sign in to request a correction