Published 27 May 2026, 18:49 UTC · fetched 6 Nov 2026, 14:17 UTC
George
@George1Trader
Quoting · 22 Feb 2026, 10:47 UTC · context given to the AI
#btc Seems like I didn't miss much. Weekly candles not really moving down here, so I think monthly close will be key. If we manage to get some more upside here in the next couple days and close around range lows at $73k I think we could form a bottom around blue. If not, and we close the monthly ugly below range lows there's a chance we see an even bigger pull back towards $50k lows. Personally don't think we see much lower than that tho. Let's see what we get.#btc Two months later, still holding above blue demand. Classic when you get some red candles everyone straight away starts talking about new weekly lows, so here's my view on the HTF. Do I think 40k is impossible? Definitely not, anything can happen. But people already talking about it while we're still trading above $70k feels a bit exaggerated. Even when looking at the htfs it's still level after level and in between here and $40k, there's a lot of levels... Key for me is the weekly range low at $74500, basically where we're trading at right now. If we break back below (weekly close), it confirms a deviation above and I think we at least sweep some lows into high 60k's, potentially lower into blue. Where do I flip bullish again? If we reclaim that level again at $74.5k. Where do I start targeting sub 50s? We haven't closed a weekly below $65.5k ish and that lines up beautifully with our local range lows. Close below there confirms a break down of the range and then Ill be looking at weekly liquidity sub $49k. Let's see what's next.View original on X ↗
Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result
unscored Awaiting manual review
Only the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology
Uses only text available at publication time
Think the interpretation or outcome is wrong? Sign in with X to request a correction, so reviewers know who is asking.
Sign in to request a correction