Loading…
Published 20 May 2026, 07:55 UTC · fetched 6 Nov 2026, 14:17 UTC
swarmik
@swarmister
Quoting · 20 May 2026, 07:39 UTC · context given to the AI
$BTC smol quick update So it’s happening, there are signs of a genuine reversal (though it’s only a local one, so don’t get your hopes up too high), but a break above 77.7k would provide a more likely scenario for a rise to 79.5 It needs to hold above 77.7k to have the potential to rise toward the 79.5k zone It would be great to see a rising market in the coming days, that would make a lot of sense from a TA perspective, and it would also be very favorable for my large $HYPE position, because while the hype might be strong, a drop in Bitcoin’s price could slow down the growth, which usually wears out the bulls and would force them to exit their positions early = sell, I hope you get the logic I’ll post a big update after I go to the institute, I have exams right nowI need to add a cluster analysis to my quick $BTC update, as this is very important here, along with a long setup. After opening the week with a decline, a price zone formed on BTC from which there was an attempt to break out upward, followed by two attempts to break out downward. A double false breakout means the potential is now directed upward. Moreover, a HUGE cluster has formed on the daily chart within this price zone, signaling the emergence of stop-loss volume on the downside This confirms my theory about a move to 79.5k; this is not a full-fledged reversal, I repeat, but a technical correction within a bear market. Also, looking at the 15m tf, a limit buyer appeared this morning in the narrowing near the lower boundary. We are now seeing an upward breakout; ideally, we would see a test of the imbalances, meaning a squeeze down to 76.8–76.9 could be considered a long entry point.View original on X ↗
Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result
unscored Repeat call within an existing 24h episode
Only the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology
Repeated same-asset, same-direction calls count once, anchored to the first eligible post
Uses only text available at publication time
Think the interpretation or outcome is wrong? Sign in with X to request a correction, so reviewers know who is asking.
Sign in to request a correction