Loading…

Prediction evidence

correctPolicy v1.0

Source post

Published 10 May 2026, 08:31 UTC · fetched 3 Nov 2026, 10:55 UTC

gainzy

@gainzy222

Last bull run objectively sucked. But there were signs it would - a large contingent of CT was wealthy enough at the start of it that they felt comfortable full porting eth and coasting. They all got fucked. This time everyone is poor as shit. It’s shaping up to be a proper bull https://t.co/cDN5V6pob3

View original on X ↗

How this was scored

Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result

Baseline: first ETH price at or after publication, $2,330 at 10 May 2026, 09:00 UTC.
Evaluation: price at the end of the 24 hours horizon, $2,330 at 11 May 2026, 09:00 UTC.
r = 2329.8 / 2329.68 − 1 = +0.0%
Direction d = +1 (bullish), so d × r = +0.0% (neutral only if the price is unchanged) → correct

Only the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology

AI interpretation

Uses only text available at publication time

Asset: Ethereum (ETH)
Direction: ▲ Bullish
Intent: inferred
Horizon: 24 hours (default, none stated)
Evidence span: “But there were signs it would - a large contingent of CT was wealthy enough at the start of it that they felt comfortable full porting eth and coasting.”
Confidence: 93%
Review state: auto accepted
Model / prompt: gpt-6-luna+decisions · decisions-v3

Prediction evidence

Source post

How this was scored

AI interpretation

Outcome record

Request a correction