Prediction evidence

incorrectPolicy v1.0

Source post

Published 19 Apr 2026, 17:42 UTC · fetched 20 Oct 2026, 05:25 UTC

Altcoin Sherpa

@AltcoinSherpa

In reply to · 19 Apr 2026, 17:40 UTC · context given to the AI

@AltcoinSherpa https://t.co/WSBauInXYZ eth still a winner don’t get it twisted don’t even have to hold any to know this

@bootzz So you think ethbtc makes a big comeback? There are certainly going to be periods where it outperforms as always. But the bleeding the last few years has been telling and I don't see that changing much personally

View original on X ↗

How this was scored

Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result

Baseline: first ETH price at or after publication, $2,297 at 19 Apr 2026, 18:00 UTC.
Evaluation: price at the end of the 24 hours horizon, $2,318 at 20 Apr 2026, 18:00 UTC.
r = 2318 / 2296.7 − 1 = +0.93%
Direction d = −1 (bearish), so d × r = -0.93% (neutral only if the price is unchanged) → incorrect

Only the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology

AI interpretation

Uses only text available at publication time

Asset: Ethereum (ETH)
Direction: ▼ Bearish
Intent: inferred
Horizon: 24 hours (default, none stated)
Evidence span: “@bootzz So you think ethbtc makes a big comeback? There are certainly going to be periods where it outperforms as always. But the bleeding the last few years has been telling and I don't see that changing much personally”
Confidence: 92%
Review state: auto accepted
Model / prompt: gpt-6-luna+decisions · decisions-v3

Prediction evidence

Source post

How this was scored

AI interpretation

Outcome record

Request a correction